I want to make two clarifications based on today's discussion. First, I am using, words, as working titles to help summarize and memorize what the work (film / drawings) that follow are attempting to arrive towards. In that sense, words are innate tools that assist in constructing, similar to a drawing or a model. Second, there has been some conflicting information. According to these two sources, the definition of "laconic" is as follows:
1. Dictionary.com
using few words; expressing much in few words; concise
—Synonyms brief, pithy, terse; succinct.
—Antonyms voluble.
2. Webster's New World Dictionary
brief or terse in speech or expression; using few words
—SYN CONCISE
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
now what are you gonna believe...the dictionary or dan?
check this out in the perspecta archive on jstor...
Perspecta, Vol. 26, Theater, Theatricality, and Architecture, 1990
I found it. Are you referring to a specific article that is relevent or the whole volume of 26?
as you like...
its great to be able to browse the perspecta journals...check out assemblage too...
Post a Comment